Field service: Reenergizing a hidden asset

When faced with angry customers, rocketing fuel prices and IT meltdowns, utility executives don’t often think of the guys in hard hats as their top priority. It’s easy to say that field service operations could run more smoothly, but it’s harder to say how—and even harder to make it happen. But achieving full potential in field service can save utilities a lot of time and money. Productivity and efficiency reviews targeted at field service operations, done correctly, can reinforce other areas of the business by increasing customer satisfaction and improving safety and quality. For many utilities, it’s worth another look.

Bumper crew ron palinkas national field serviceHistorically, field service units—the crews that install, maintain, repair and replace various components of the core utility infrastructure—have been highly decentralized. Often run as mini and distinct geographic businesses with little oversight from the corporate headquarters, many field service units haven’t kept up with industry best practices. Additionally, it has also often been difficult to fully assess the field service opportunity due to inconsistent, and often poor, data quality. But with an increase in big IT automation projects and the accompanying emphasis on functional expertise, companies can ill afford to let their field service units flounder in isolation.

CM321s01 national field serviceWhy is field service so often a company’s weakest link? First, in major markets around the world we have seen a rapid increase in both the workload and the costs associated with field service activities due to increasing capacity utilization and aging networks, the introduction of complex new technologies, and growing demand from customers (and regulators) for a wider range and greater reliability of services. Second, many field service units operate with low expectations for employee efficiency or engagement. The legacy of public-sector ownership includes corps of unionized field service workers who are sometimes inflexible and resistant to change. They are often skeptical of process simplification and look warily (if at all) at recommendations from corporate headquarters. And yet the increasing complexity of new technology has created real skill gaps for many field service workforces. Finally, with the difficulty in accurately measuring productivity, it’s hard to know when things are working well and when they aren’t.

aspire1national field serviceGetting to “full potential” first requires a definition of the opportunity for improvement, but even this can be difficult. Benchmarking usually falls short, in part because most companies lack reliable, comparable productivity metrics. The variation in work types (e.g., new business vs. maintenance vs. breakdown), a mix of different resource levels and types across units, and geographic differences further complicate the process. Instead, a more effective approach is a holistic diagnostic, which breaks down the various components of field service operations to see how efficient they really are.

This includes a broad look at the entire workflow process — not just field service personnel themselves. To be most useful, the diagnostic should provide efficiency ratings for the key areas of activity:

Volume of jobs, which can be classified as good (e.g., good plans or job designs), potentially avoidable (e.g., modified by field or scheduling) or bad (e.g., rejected by field or scheduling);

Utilization, which measures a crew’s productive hours as a percentage of the total (i.e., actual time spent working contrasted with nonscheduled time, idle time, sick time and holidays);

Work rate, which measures the rate at which employees can complete jobs due to optimization of jobs designs and scheduling;

Hourly cost, which analyzes the total cost of labor, including overtime (for in-house work vs. contractors);

“Overhead and other,” which addresses the costs of supporting nonfield activities (e.g., resource planning, dispatch) and nonlabor costs (e.g., fleet).

Recognizing that unique units and divisions do—and often should—operate differently, an effective diagnostic looks closely at day-to-day operations in multiple areas. Once completed, the diagnostic quickly brings inefficient processes to light. It also provides a robust data baseline from which to measure and prioritize opportunities for improvement. In a diagnostic conducted by one US utility, for example, an analysis of how crews spent their time revealed that less than 50 percent was spent on actual maintenance or construction work. The upshot: in order to make crews more effective, executives would have to address key challenges in the areas of work order quality, scheduling, work support and performance management.

Paris, NATO, and Article 5

Capture ron palinkas amazon logoOzy made an excellent point concerning the recent attack in Paris and France’s rights under Article 5 of NATO.  John McLaughlin, former Deputy Director of the CIA states”French President François Hollande has called the attacks an “act or war,” and as a NATO member, France is entitled to request a NATO consultation that could lead to invoking Article 5 of the treaty. Under Article 5, all 28 members must come to the aid of a member who is attacked.”

Paris Attack84974_gettyimages497051076 ron palinkasReminiscent of the Tom Clancy novel “Clear and Present Danger”, a declaration and request for assistance would help mobilize intelligence resources to actively combat ISIS.  Pooling intelligence resources is the first step to preventing future attacks.  McLaughlin makes an excellent point about how to prevent future attacks. “You have to do three things to combat terrorism: Destroy the leadership, deny terrorists safe haven and change the conditions that give rise to the phenomenon. At this point, we have to focus on the first two, because the third is too complicated and long-range.”

The only other time Article 5 has been invoked is after 9/11 when all 28 countries volunteered to come to the assistance of the US.

“Solidarite” clip art from Amazon, text and picture from Ozy Article The Paris Attacks: A Former CIA Chief Weighs In


How to Be More Positive

3e21c9c9-80da-44f0-928d-eb8cf36e33a4-original ron palinkas positive at work

I came across the chart online and it gave me the chance to reflect on how I could be more positive.  We are bombarded online everyday with self-help guides, how-to’s, and lessons learned.   I agree that you will probably not find any one chart, book, or pamphlet that will provide a perfect road map.  If you search for inspirational “to action” quotes on the web, there are many.  The easiest and most practical step is to move ahead, even just very small and incrementally, from where you are now, to where you want to be tomorrow.  Tomorrow, next month, or next year.  It starts by recognizing that you must take action.   To Action Quotes! (It’s unfortunate the word “Criticism” was misspelled, but otherwise a great piece.)